On Technology and Borders of Knowledge

The other day I was talking to a classmate of mine, who is studying for a master degree. We had a test and he asked me if I had brought a calculator. I said yes, but I also added that the math for this test is quite easy and we may not need a calculator, since it was just multiplying some numbers.

He looked at me and said: “Oh, but I have forgotten how to multiply numbers!” Come to think of it, though I have not forgotten how to multiply, I have forgotten how to find square root of different numbers, and there was once that I “knew” how to do that. It was before we were allowed to have calculators.

Then, some days later, I read about how Google has weakened (and stimulated) our memories.

But the important question is, is this a problem? It is interesting that a new technology can significantly change the way we think, and also the things that we think about, but does this weaken us, deteriorating our memory in a way that eventually takes away our brains’ ability to produce any creative thought?

Of course, the link above about Google should show that it is not so. Our “creativity” shifts, but it does not deteriorates.

But yet, the fact about calculators and our ability to “calculate” still seems disturbing. Is it not that math is one of our most important and fundamental abilities? To the extent that this fundamental ability comes first, even before any other natural science or knowledge?

My answer to this is, this may seem very disturbing on first glance, but when we look at it again, we see that we might have forgotten “How” to calculate square roots or to multiply (though the latter is quite disturbing under any circumstances!), but we have not forgotten “What” they mean. That is why we can save time by not calculating what is trivial, to spend on higher levels of thought and broadening the borders of our thought and knowledge. Without technology we would never have been where we are now.

______________________________

P.S: This could also show why relying on technology is dangerous, but yet necessary and inevitable: Imagine suddenly we lose our cell phones. 30 years ago, there was no such a thing, and 15 years ago it might not have been a big problem. But now, who can live without them?!

Advertisements

Published by

thetruthfulheretic

Dear fellow Homo sapiens, or if you prefer conscious mammals! And of course, friends nonetheless: I created my blog in order to speak my very weird mind, mostly about three subjects (as I identify myself and my state of mind with them): Atheism, as I was born in the Middle East and saw and felt the affects of Islam; Homosexuality and equal rights, as a gay man who has tasted the Homophobia and also Sexism in that society; and Liberalism and political philosophy, which I think is a good ground for secular values and criticism of fundamentalism. If you wish, visit and join your state of mind to mine. I hope they don't short circuit!

3 thoughts on “On Technology and Borders of Knowledge”

    1. Well, yes. But that actually helps us, maybe like a shortcut to more knowing. Just after I posted the thing above, I read about how computer games enabled us to decode the HIV virus protein.

      When I heard this news I got really excited: We should tell this to childrens’ mothers when they call computer games “useless”!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s